Skip to content

fix: Type soundness issue with Provider.resolveObjectEvaluation #1158#1361

Open
ScottVenkataraman wants to merge 2 commits intoopen-feature:mainfrom
ScottVenkataraman:feat/resolveObjectEvaluation_issue
Open

fix: Type soundness issue with Provider.resolveObjectEvaluation #1158#1361
ScottVenkataraman wants to merge 2 commits intoopen-feature:mainfrom
ScottVenkataraman:feat/resolveObjectEvaluation_issue

Conversation

@ScottVenkataraman
Copy link

This PR

Updates the TypeScript method signature of resolveObjectEvaluation so that the defaultValue has a type of JsonValue and the returned promise's ResolutionDetails has a type of JsonValue

@ScottVenkataraman ScottVenkataraman requested review from a team as code owners March 6, 2026 15:52
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a type soundness issue within the Provider.resolveObjectEvaluation method. By refining the TypeScript signature, it ensures that the defaultValue and the resolved promise's ResolutionDetails consistently handle JsonValue types, preventing potential type mismatches and improving the robustness of the API.

Highlights

  • Type Signature Update: The TypeScript method signature for resolveObjectEvaluation has been updated to ensure type soundness. Specifically, the defaultValue parameter's type was changed from a generic T to JsonValue, and the return type was adjusted from Promise<ResolutionDetails<T>> to Promise<ResolutionDetails<JsonValue>>.
Changelog
  • packages/server/src/provider/provider.ts
    • Updated the type signature of the resolveObjectEvaluation method to use JsonValue for defaultValue and the return type.
Activity
  • No specific activity has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ScottVenkataraman ScottVenkataraman changed the title [BUG] Type soundness issue with Provider.resolveObjectEvaluation #1158 fix: Type soundness issue with Provider.resolveObjectEvaluation #1158 Mar 6, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a type soundness issue in resolveObjectEvaluation by using JsonValue for the default value and return type. However, this is a breaking change for the Provider interface, and the pull request is incomplete as it doesn't update the implementing classes like InMemoryProvider and MultiProvider. This will cause compilation errors. Please update all implementations of the Provider interface. I have also left a comment with a suggestion to further improve the new interface signature by removing a now-unused generic parameter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant