Fixed reg_offset handling in stlink_usb_read_all_regs( )#1027
Merged
Nightwalker-87 merged 1 commit intostlink-org:developfrom Sep 15, 2020
arsv:develop
Merged
Fixed reg_offset handling in stlink_usb_read_all_regs( )#1027Nightwalker-87 merged 1 commit intostlink-org:developfrom arsv:develop
Nightwalker-87 merged 1 commit intostlink-org:developfrom
arsv:develop
Conversation
chenguokai
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
Nightwalker-87
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
Nightwalker-87
changed the title
Member
|
Thx @arsv. 👍 |
This was referenced Oct 25, 2020
This was referenced Nov 9, 2020
This was
linked to
issues
Mar 12, 2021
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change brings the code in sync with the comment several lines above and fixes issue #1026 for me.
Please double check this! I'm not familiar with this project, and I have no idea how it could possibly work without this change.
(Closes #1002, Closes #1011, Closes #1026, Closes #1038, Closes #1064, Closes #1065)