Skip to content

Delete RBS annotation explicitly in preventTargetPoolRaceWithRBSOnCreation#2145

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
panslava:fix-race
May 24, 2023
Merged

Delete RBS annotation explicitly in preventTargetPoolRaceWithRBSOnCreation#2145
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
panslava:fix-race

Conversation

@panslava
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As we removed deleting RBS annotation in garbageCollectRBSNetLB we now need to remove annotation explicitly, otherwise service will not be handled by legacy controller

/assign @cezarygerard

…ation

As we removed deleting RBS annotation in garbageCollectRBSNetLB we now
need to remove annotation explicitly, otherwise service will not be
handled by legacy controller
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from aojea and code-elinka May 24, 2023 18:53
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 24, 2023
@cezarygerard
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cezarygerard, panslava

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [cezarygerard,panslava]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f8c69e3 into kubernetes:master May 24, 2023
return result.Error
}
return nil
return lc.deleteRBSAnnotation(service)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems to mutate the object, is it considering that the object belong to the cache or the passed service is a copy?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question. Can I ask you, what problem appears when we mutate cache object?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants