Update issue template

[mcbarton]

This PR updates the issue template for the repo to complement the PR which adds a pull request template here #118

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.41%. Comparing base (13e56df) to head (12b63f3).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #137      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.08%   79.41%   +4.32%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines         602      612      +10     
  Branches       59       59              
==========================================
+ Hits          452      486      +34     
+ Misses        150      126      -24     

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[mcbarton]

@anutosh491 @JohanMabille @alexander-penev can one you please review this PR and the other one linked?

[mcbarton]

@JohanMabille can you take another look at this PR? I fixed all the issues you raised except switching to Github labels. With regards to the Github labels issue I plan to add a workflow which automatically tags each new issue a 'Needs Review' label (needs creating if you could do this for me since I don't have the permissions to do this). It will then be upto the person who reviews the issue to add the correct labels based on the description of the issue.

[vgvassilev]

Can you try again to create a label? I added you to the repo.

[mcbarton]

Can you try again to create a label? I added you to the repo.

Thank you I am now able to add a label :)

[mcbarton]

@JohanMabille I have now addressed all your issues with this PR and its ready for another review.

[JohanMabille]

Can I suggest to use the label "Needs triage" instead of "Needs review" for new issues? It is more widespread in OSS repos (at least on GH). otherwise, LGTM.

[mcbarton]

Can I suggest to use the label "Needs triage" instead of "Needs review" for new issues? It is more widespread in OSS repos (at least on GH). otherwise, LGTM.

@JohanMabille done.

[JohanMabille]

Thanks!