Skip to content

wip: Strongly Typed Path strings and therefore fix all mismatch/normalisation issues on windows#18692

Draft
Hona wants to merge 44 commits intoanomalyco:devfrom
Hona:feat/brand-paths-everywhere
Draft

wip: Strongly Typed Path strings and therefore fix all mismatch/normalisation issues on windows#18692
Hona wants to merge 44 commits intoanomalyco:devfrom
Hona:feat/brand-paths-everywhere

Conversation

@Hona
Copy link
Member

@Hona Hona commented Mar 23, 2026

No description provided.

Hona added 30 commits March 18, 2026 20:46
…rywhere

# Conflicts:
#	packages/opencode/src/file/index.ts
#	packages/opencode/src/file/watcher.ts
#	packages/opencode/src/lsp/server.ts
#	packages/opencode/src/permission/index.ts
#	packages/opencode/src/permission/service.ts
#	packages/opencode/src/skill/skill.ts
@Hona Hona changed the title wip: Strongly Typed Path IDs and therefore fix all mismatch/normalisation issues on windows wip: Strongly Typed Path strings and therefore fix all mismatch/normalisation issues on windows Mar 23, 2026
Copy link

@atharvau atharvau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review for PR #18692: WIP Path Handling

⚠️ Work in Progress - Early Feedback

This PR appears to be a comprehensive rewrite of path handling for Windows compatibility. Since it's marked as WIP with no description and a very large diff (20k+ lines), here's some early feedback:


📋 Recommendations for Development

  1. Add PR Description: Please add a detailed description explaining:

    • What problems this solves
    • High-level approach taken
    • Breaking changes introduced
    • Testing strategy
  2. Consider Breaking Into Smaller PRs: This could potentially be split into:

    • Type definitions and interfaces
    • Core path utilities
    • Migration of existing usage
    • Tests and validation
  3. Add Tests: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for:

    • Windows-specific path scenarios
    • Cross-platform compatibility
    • Migration paths for existing data
  4. Review vs PR #18709: This seems related to the other path handling PR (#18709). Consider how they relate and if they can be consolidated.


🔍 Ready for Review When:

  • PR description added with clear goals
  • Tests included for path handling logic
  • Potential breaking changes documented
  • WIP status removed

Happy to provide detailed technical review once the PR is ready for review!

Status: AWAITING AUTHOR (WIP)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants